Final blog- Questionnaire

I have now finished my blog and hope you have enjoyed reading my opinions and views on certain topic areas. Here is my evaluation post!

Age?
18

Sex?
Female

What is your degree subject (both if joint)?
Religious studies and Philosophy

Does ‘Being Bad’ relate well to the other modules you are taking?
Not really

If so, how? And if not, why not?
Because my other modules are either on religion or philosophers.

Have you found ‘Being Bad’ too demanding, too easy, or at an appropriate level?
I found the lecturers easy to understand and at an appropriate standard, however the blog was very time consuming. Overall i have enjoyed learning about people's opinions and watching the films.

Do you think the list of topics covered on the module was appropriate?
Each topic was relevant and so yes they were appropriate

Are there any topics not included in the module that you would like to see included?
Prositution, arranged marriages (extreme), i have included these topics within my blog though!

Do you think that the format for classes has worked well?
Yes they were fun to attend!

What did you think of the module team?
All the module team were easy to understand and most importantly were very friendly. However disipline needs to be increased as many people talk through lecturers and i find that very disturbing whilst making notes!

Do you think it would have been better to have had more:
Small group discussions?
Discussion and debate among the class as a whole?
Information and talk from lectureres?
I think more discussions would have meant less distractions!

The approach taken in the module is interdisciplinary (drawing on perspectives from English Literature, Film Studies, Creative Writing, Philosophy, Religious Studies, Media Studies and Politics): do you think this a useful way of approaching the topics covered in the module?
Yes, because the module needs to appeal to students from all courses.

Do you think that interdisciplinary modules are a good idea?
Yes because most degrees have crossovers.

Do you think you have benefited from the interdisciplinary approach taken in the module?
Yes because i have widened my learning area by learning things not specific to my module.

Would you like to see more modules that cover this kind of subject matter?
Yes because this lecture was such a pleasure to attend

Are you planning to take the follow-up module PH2004 ‘It Shouldn’t Be Allowed’ at level 2?
Yes i will be, i am looking forward to it!

Would you recommend ‘Being Bad’ to a friend?
Definately

Do you think that the blogs (web logs) were a good idea?
Yes because although it was time consuming, it was fun to do, much better than a presentation assessment!

What did you think of the other assessments (e.g. would it be better to have one longer assessment rather than two shorter ones?)?
They were manageable however i would have preffered one assessment instead of teo worth 30% each.

What have you learned from the module?
That for some topics there is not a right answer.

What parts of the module have you found most useful and why?
In these blogs a requirement was to make comments on other people's blogs, this therefore intiated a friendly debate which i think is a good skill to have in a philosophy module.

What parts do you think were a waste of time and why?
I don't really think any parts of the module were a waste of time.

Are there any other comments you wish to make regarding ‘Being Bad’?
That I have thoroughly enjoyed this module!